quarta-feira, 6 de agosto de 2025

Desporto - Sumo (Torneio de Julho)

 Uma vitória inesperada...





 Uma eterna rivalidade e uma constante confusão





The Spectator - How the French right can still win

 (personal underlines)

How the French right can still win

It has been a terrible year for the Le Pen family. Jean-Marie died in the first week of January. He was the patriarch who in 1972 co-founded the National Front and grew it into a formidable political machine before handing over to his daughter. Marine took command in 2011 and, through a strategy of ‘de-demonisation’, transformed the rebranded National Rally into the biggest single party in the National Assembly with 125 seats. She has reached the second round of the last two presidential elections, but it won’t be third time lucky for Marine Le Pen.

On Monday, a judge disqualified her from politics for five years for misusing EU funds between 2004 and 2016. Le Pen was also given a four-year suspended prison sentence and fined €100,000. Twenty-four other members of her party, including eight MEPs, were given lesser sentences for what the judge described as well-organised malfeasance. It was accepted that neither she nor her co-accused had personally enriched themselves with €2.9 million from the EU coffers, but in using the money to finance the party the judge said that Le Pen had ‘circumvented democracy’.

Le Pen stormed out of the court before the sentence was passed, but had calmed down by the evening when she appeared live on television. Nevertheless, she was in combative mood. It wasn’t just her who had been excluded, she declared, ‘it’s millions of French people whose votes have been eliminated’. She described the sentence as a ‘political decision’ and a ‘violation of the State of Law’. Le Pen confirmed that she will appeal the judgment, and she also had a message for her 11 million voters: ‘Don’t worry, I’m not demoralised, I’m outraged.’

Her appeal will be heard next year with a decision made that summer, so time is not on her side, given that the presidential election will be held in April 2027. There is a good chance her appeal will not be successful.

So what are the options for the National Rally assuming Marine Le Pen has been cancelled? Many see an obvious successor
in Jordan Bardella, the 29-year-old president of the National Rally, who last year spearheaded the party’s triumphant European election campaign. A poll conducted last week revealed that 60 per cent of National Rally supporters prefer Bardella to Le Pen. These will likely be younger voters or more bourgeois ones.

Living as I do in Burgundy, a National Rally stronghold, I am acquainted with several people who admire Bardella, and they fall into these two demographics. I also know voters who are loyal to Le Pen: they are middle-aged and working-class. A couple of decades ago they voted for the left, but they gravitated towards the Le Pens because father and daughter expressed their feelings about the ravages of deindustrialisation, the problems of mass immigration and the overreach of the European Union.

While Le Pen is routinely described as ‘far-right’, economically she is statist. In an interview earlier this year she was asked how she would reduce France’s exorbitant civil service wage bill. She brushed off the question, exclaiming: ‘No, no, that’s right-wing stuff!’ Even on questions of identity, she’s hardly a hardliner. In a debate in 2021 with Gérald Darmanin, then the minister of the interior and now the minister of justice, Le Pen was accused of being ‘soft’ on Islamism.

But Le Pen will always be the darling of the white working-class because, like them, she carries the scars of an arduous life. She survived a bomb attack on her family home when she was eight; she had a very acrimonious falling out with her father when she expelled him from the party for his anti-Semitism; and she has faced her share of political humiliation, such as when Emmanuel Macron shamed her in a live television debate in 2017. It’s not just the British who admire a plucky and indomitable underdog; so do the French. Her latest setback will only increase her appeal for her many admirers, even if she is unable to stand.

If Bardella is officially anointed as Le Pen’s successor, will he be able to appeal to the Le Pen loyalists? It will certainly take some work to win over the older working classes. Ironically, he is genuinely working-class, unlike the bourgeois Le Pen, having grown up in the notoriously tough district of Seine-Saint-Denis in northern Paris. Bardella is handsome and courteous, as well as a little bland, which doesn’t necessarily endear him to Le Pen’s tribe.

In recent months, some National Rally voters have accused Bardella of moving too far towards the centre. This prompted the left-wing newspaper Le Monde to write about the ‘Macronisation’ of Bardella. Certainly, Bardella’s response to Donald Trump’s victory last year could have come from the lips of the French president. There was no sense of triumph at the victory of an anti-establishment outsider; rather Bardella expressed his anxiety about what it might mean for Europe in terms of defence, industry, agriculture and energy policy.

Perhaps there was some sense to this. Since Trump took office, both Le Pen and Bardella have been strangely subdued. It may have been part of their strategy of ‘respectability’, of portraying themselves as democrats not demagogues, in the hope the judge would go easy on them. Fat lot of
good that did.

Le Pen may never comprehend that the bourgeois left, prevalent among the elite of the media, judiciary, arts and academia, will hate her to the grave. She can ‘de-demonise’ her party as much as she likes, but she will always be a Le Pen, the daughter ofa man the 1968 generation characterised as the devil incarnate.

But in many ways, her disqualification creates an interesting opportunity for the National Rally, and more broadly the French right. Last year, Bardella published his memoir, Ce que je cherche (What I’m Looking For), in which he wrote: ‘The idea of uniting working-class French people and part of the conservative bourgeoisie in a single movement – as Nicolas Sarkozy did in 2007 –
is a good one.’

This conservative bourgeoisie once voted overwhelmingly for the centre-right Republicans, the party of Sarkozy. When Sarkozy was elected president in 2007, the Republicans won 313 of the 577 seats in the subsequent parliamentary elections. Today they are down to 39. Much like the Tories, the Republicans have moved too far to the centre in recent years, while failing to address the concerns of their voters about immigration and economic insecurity.

One consequence of this was the emergence of Éric Zemmour, who launched his Reconquest party in 2021 and polled 2.4 million votes in the 2022 presidential election, 800,000 more than the Republicans.

Le Pen and Zemmour are enemies, a result of her refusal to enter into a coalition with Reconquest in 2022. Bardella is more responsive, and in his autobiography he said he agreed with much of Zemmour’s diagnosis about what had gone wrong with France. Meanwhile Marion Maréchal, Marine’s niece, served until last year as the vice-president of Reconquest. Like Zemmour, Maréchal is more economically liberal and more socially conservative than her aunt.

Le Pen was upset when Maréchal joined Zemmour’s party in 2022, but it was a short-lived switch. Maréchal fell out with Zemmour during last year’s parliamentary elections when she called for an alliance with the National Rally. Maréchal, an MEP, now heads her own party, Identity and Freedom, which consists of her and two other MEPs. She is once more a close ally of the National Rally.

An interesting detail to note, too, is that Maréchal is also close to Giorgia Meloni. Her husband is Italian and a former MEP in Meloni’s Brothers of Italy party. Maréchal, Bardella and the French right may now be looking to Italy’s Prime Minister for inspiration in the post-Le Pen world. In 2022, Meloni triumphed in Italy’s general election as the leader of a right-wing coalition. She and her deputy PM, Matteo Salvini, have their ideological differences, but they overcame them, and their reward was power.

If the French right is to triumph, it will need to show similar political maturity, and that includes the Republican party. One of their senior figures, Laurent Wauquiez, said earlier this year that the only barrier to forming an alliance with the National Rally was they ‘don’t have the same ideas on the economy’. In other words, the Republicans have no problem with the National Rally’s views on mass immigration and law and order.

While it has been a terrible year for the Le Pen family, then, it could turn out to be a transformative one for the National Rally, but only if it reaches out to other parties and creates a broader movement. If not, there is the possibility that a left-wing coalition will propel Jean-Luc Mélenchon to power.

The Spectator - Israel’s Iran attack has done the West a favour

 

(personal underlines)

Israel’s Iran attack has done the West a favour

Iranian protesters take to the streets of Tehran after the Israeli strikes overnight (Credit: Alamy)

Israel’s overnight strikes on the Islamic Republic of Iran represent the initial salvo of what Jerusalem is calling Operation Rising Lion. In Genesis 49, Jacob tells his sons: ‘Judah is a lion’s cub/ from the prey, my son, you rise up/ He lies down and crouches like a lion/ like a lioness — who dares disturb him?’

Israel rose up after years of warning the world of Iran’s plot to acquire nuclear weapons. In a series of daring precision strikes, it has targeted key regime figures, ballistic missile supplies and the Natanz nuclear facility. Israeli intelligence reportedly learned that Tehran had produced enough enriched uranium to build 15 nuclear bombs and was approaching ‘the point of no return’. Israel is describing its actions as a ‘preemptive strike’, hinting that the possibility of an Iranian attack on Israel was growing.

Hossein Salami, head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, is dead. Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of Iran’s armed forces, is also believed to have been killed. Among the other fatalities are key officials and scientists involved in the regime’s nuclear programme.

There are reports that Mossad agents embedded deep in Iran sabotaged the Islamic state’s military air defences. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) characterised its air strikes as ‘the opening blow’ and stated that ‘at the end of the operation, there will be no nuclear threat’. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said: ‘We can’t leave these threats for the next generation, because if we don’t act now, there will not be another generation. If we don’t act now, we simply won’t be here.’

In a direct message to ordinary Iranians, he added that Israel harboured no enmity towards them but rather towards the fundamentalist dictatorship.

In retaliation, Iran has dispatched more than 100 drones to bomb Israel. Jerusalem is bracing itself for painful reprisals and has put its citizens on alert. Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, the IDF’s chief of staff, has cautioned Israelis: ‘The expected cost will be different from what we are used to.’

This suggests the top brass and the security cabinet have factored in the potential for significant loss of Israeli lives or severe damage to hardware, infrastructure or networks, but calculated that a greater cost would have been incurred by inaction. There are no good options for Israel. Iran is sworn to the destruction of the Jewish state and nuclear weapons would allow the Ayatollah Khamenei to inflict devastating, existential destruction on Israel and her people. Whatever loss of life follows Rising Lion would be dwarfed by the mass extermination Iran could carry out with nuclear arms.

In addition to the military blowback, there will be diplomatic ramifications. This will include fallout from traditionally anti-Israel institutions such as the United Nations and censure from European nations increasingly concerned with managing internal cohesion and extremism problems and eager to be seen by some segments of their populations as distancing themselves from Israel.

Jerusalem will be interested primarily in the impact on relations with the United States. The Americans took no part in Rising Lion and president Donald Trump had been urging calm to allow a fresh nuclear deal with Iran to be struck. Mindful of how the Obama nuclear deal, cancelled during the first Trump administration, gave Tehran breathing space under the guise of hemming in its nuclear programme, Israel might well have assessed that Trump was on the brink of making the same mistake and acted before Tehran could lock in favourable terms for its uranium enrichment and warhead capabilities. Although the operation had been foreshadowed by the evacuation of senior American personnel from the region, Israel had previously been on the brink of taking out Tehran’s offensive nuclear capabilities only to be reined in by Washington DC.

Trump is instinctively pro-Israel, as is his Secretary of State Marco Rubio. But his second administration has witnessed an influx into the national security and foreign policy bureaucracies of isolationist ideologues hostile to Israel. These figures think of Israel as a malign ally that talks in pro-American terms but could drag the United States into further Middle Eastern conflict. This is, in part, because of American policymakers’ and voters’ affinity for the embattled nation, and also because of the implications of allowing another large-scale elimination of Jews less than a century on from the Shoah. 

These sentiments are misplaced. Far from a drag on America First, an Israel that takes proactive measures against common enemies like Iran enhances American security while allowing Washington DC to maintain clean hands. A nuclear-armed Iran would overnight become caller of the shots in West Asia; Tehran would be able to inflict sizeable casualties on American and other Western citizens and assets in the region, as well as disrupting military, intelligence and trading operations. It would be able to hold the West to ransom for political, diplomatic and financial gain.

There are echoes in Rising Lion of Operation Opera, the 1981 mission that destroyed Osirak, Saddam Hussein’s nuclear reactor, and Operation Outside the Box, the 2007 bombing of Syria’s offensive nuclear programme at Al Kibar. The Osirak bombing was met by widespread international condemnation, denunciatory resolutions and diplomatic hysteria, but over time it became clear that Israel had done the world a favour in denying nuclear capabilities to a madman. Ironically, had Israel deferred to the world opinion and left Osirak alone, by the eve of the second Iraq War in 2003 Saddam almost certainly would have been able to hit British (and American) assets within 45 minutes.

Israel can expect the same indignant response from the international community now as it did then. But it can be safe in the knowledge that it has acted not only in its own interests but in the strategic, security and commercial interests of the Western nations lining up to condemn it. That is the way of it when you are one of the few remaining democracies that believes in destroying your enemies before they can destroy you. Other nations might think it proper to wait until the UN, the EU and the legal professoriate give them the green light to wanly defend themselves, by which point their cities are already smouldering and endless body bags being filled from the rubble. But Israel is not one of them.

‘Judah,’ Jacob tells his fourth son, ‘your brothers shall praise you/ Your hand shall be on the neck of your enemies’. Judah’s hand has struck his foes and those of his brothers but there will be little in the way of fraternal commendation. The lion’s cub has risen up, not for praise but for survival.

Reflexão - E a banda continua a afundar (Alexandre Borges)


 

(sublinhados pessoais)

E a banda continua a afundar

Quando somos nós, sociedade civil, a criar, no século XXI, associações cujo fito é taxar fotocópias de partituras, estamos conversados.

Eu sei. Talvez a história que ande a abrir telejornais. Mas, no fim, pode ser que concorde comigo. Há nela qualquer coisa eloquente acerca da tragédia da nação.

O caso, de vez em quando, voltava às caixas das breves e foi a recorrência a fazer com que, um dia, finalmente abrisse para ver de que se tratava: a Iniciativa Liberal andava a lutar pelo direito das bandas filarmónicas a poderem fotocopiar as partituras que tinham previamente comprado.

Certo. Não estamos a falar de reprodução ilegal de música, de downloads ilegais de canções na internet para reproduzir no bar ou na discoteca que cobra 14 euros por gin e não quer gastar um cêntimo com esse pormenor dos músicos, não estamos a falar de nada disso. Estamos a dizer que, em Portugal, em 2025, uma banda filarmónica de miúdos ou adultos amadores não pode, legalmente, usar uma fotocópia de uma partitura que – vamos repetir – já comprou, para a usar em ensaios ou animar a festa da aldeia, sem risco de a ver destruída pela chuva ou levada pelo vento, perdida ou danificada pelo mero manusear da mesma.

Com certeza uma lei antiga, pensámos. Algum resquício de legislação pesadíssima do século XIX. Não contávamos que tivessem de ser esses falcões do neoliberalismo, sempre alegadamente tão insensíveis ao povo e à cultura, a corrigi-la, mas seja bem-vindo quem vier por bem. Certamente, era coisa para se resolver depressa na Assembleia e até de sorriso no rosto, na pausa entre discussões dos temas “sérios” e “fracturantes”.

Sucede que estamos em Portugal, onde nunca nada é simples – “isso”, como gostamos de dizer com triunfante gozo perante a exasperação alheia, “é que era bom”. A iniciativa até foi aprovada, até desceu à especialidade, mas como, entretanto, o Parlamento foi dissolvido, voltou tudo à estaca zero. Está assim explicado porque nos continuávamos a cruzar com títulos sobre o assunto nos rodapés dos noticiários. Há dias, já no novo Parlamento, a IL voltou a apresentar a proposta para alterar o artigo 81.º do Código do Direito de Autor e dos Direitos Conexos. Vamos ver no que dá, mas, pela imprensa, já sabemos que contará com a firme oposição da AD EDIT, associação para a qual, segundo noticiava há dias o Público, liberalizar cópia de partituras será como “legalizar a pirataria”.

E pensa o ilustre leitor: ah, agora sim descemos ao século XIX – trata-se, certamente, de alguma associação antiquíssima que zelava por estas coisas dos direitos de autor no tempo da grafonola e não se adaptou aos tempos modernos. Pois. Não é. A AD EDIT, Associação de Editores de Partituras e Compositores, foi, lê-se no sítio da internet, criada em Novembro de 2023, com a missão de “assegurar uma eficaz protecção dos direitos dos compositores e das editoras, das suas obras, no que respeita à reprodução não autorizada de partituras”.

Como sobreviveram os herdeiros de Beethoven até Novembro de 2023 sem a protecção da AD EDIT, não sabemos. Quem foi que se sentou a pensar, em Novembro de 2023 – quando levamos já duas ou três décadas de pirataria informática e a luta pelos direitos de autor já não está sequer no lado dos downloads ilegais, mas no da remuneração pelas plataformas de streaming, uso e abuso de conteúdos por plataformas de busca, redes sociais e, agora, perfeitamente devassados pela inteligência artificial – , que o que era preciso travar era o fotocopianço descarado de partituras por esses fora-da-lei das bandas filarmónicas, também não sabemos nem queremos saber. Sabemos que é o que temos no Portugal de 2025: uma associação recém-criada com o propósito de exigir uma taxa anual a bandas de crianças, jovens e amadores pelas cópias físicas ou digitais que desejem fazer das partituras que – não sei se já referimos – já compraram.

Há cerca de 700 bandas filarmónicas em Portugal, muitas delas em actividade há mais de 100 anos. Nasceram sob a liderança de professores primários, padres, meros curiosos, figuras das comunidades em geral que as criaram com o fito de animar as festividades locais, acompanhar romarias, levar instrução musical aos jovens, ocupação dos tempos livres ou simples paixão. Hoje, já vão conhecendo outras lideranças, maestros com formação específica, outros conhecimentos e capacidades técnicas, felizmente justificadas pela evolução socioeconómica do país. Mas continuam a ser o que sempre foram: uma espécie de conservatórios populares.

Vivemos num país que não consegue gastar o dinheiro que a Europa lhe dá porque não é capaz de cumprir a tempo todos os trâmites burocráticos que criou para os processos de atribuição. Que assiste, paralisado, ao sucessivo quebrar de recordes na subida dos preços das casas, enquanto continua a sufocar a construção de novos imóveis com toda a espécie de entidades, vistorias, licenciamentos, autorizações de câmaras, polícias, CCDRs, autoridades ambientais e arqueológicas, associações de moradores e abaixo-assinados em geral. Gostamos de culpar os políticos por isto – às vezes, especificamente o neoliberalismo (como se alguma vez esse cometa tivesse passado sequer ao largo das Berlengas). Mas, quando somos nós, sociedade civil, a criar, no século XXI, associações cujo fito é taxar fotocópias de partituras, estamos conversados quanto à origem do problema. Está-nos na massa dos ossos. Somos pequenos em dó menor.

Um dia destes, vamos a enterrar. E não vai haver dinheiro para pagar sequer a “Marcha Fúnebre” ao Chopin.

Séries - A ponte

Uma mulher é encontrada morta no meio da ponte Oresund, na fronteira entre a Suécia e a Dinamarca. O detetive sueco Saga Noren e Martin Rohde, do departamento de polícia de Copenhague, precisam trabalhar juntos para trazer um louco para justiça






Livros - A Liberdade dos Antigos comparada com a dos Modernos (Benjamin Constant)

 


Livro - Intimidades de Salazar

 









Almoço - Vários

Em 29 de julho de 2025, na Antiga Casa Marítima com o Jorge Orestes, o Manuel Piedade, o Filipe Melo e o Mário Guerra. Depois,...um Islay, em casa.





Almoço ("Zé Fialho")

Em 31.07, finalmente :), no Fragateiro, na Trafaria, almocei com o José Fialho, antigo colega da sisáqua. Há 22 anos que nos não víamos. Ele é, actualmente, presidente da Simarsul. Esperemos que continuemos estes pequenos, grandes encontros. 

É necessário escolher, nesta fase da vida, quem nos traz algo de realmente bom, de seriedade, de positivo.